Oh, because talking about something that COULD happen in 2010 ( we are in 2006, it doesn' t seem like the previsions are really happening ) is a fact ?

Bzzzzzt! Wrong answer. the global warming kooks are using the same specious logic and data projections to yell "the sky is falling" and run around like headless chickens. you can't use the data to argue in favor of Kyoto and then disallow it's use in another arguement. The measurements and forecasts of Australia's future level of pollution contribution are valid. They passed the US way back in the 90's and haven't looked back.