"Do you understand?"

The answer to your question is no. Loulou, Lily, Fifi, Foufou or whatever her shitty french name is, can't understand.
She's french.

C'est encore Jerry qui a pété ?

In the interest of strengthening trans-Atlantic relations, I sincerely hope that these new rules are enforced, and the punishments executed, to the fullest extent of the law.

Bad news : once upon atime zi fwench Police could hold you for two days without even talkin' to an attorney.

They had to bend to the Miranda rule, however, and modify the Codes.

That is twice this week that a frog has compared his country to the Soviet Union. There may be hope for you guys after all.

I didn't wait to come on ff.com to think and to say it.

Resisted? Most frogs on this board SUPPORT these insane laws!

All of these laws have been passed in the last decade, except insulting the President. Can you imagine the laws you'll have in 50 years?

How long before insulting Alah with cartoons is a threat to peace like booing the flag? Or maybe they will be considered promoting hatred, or whatever your idiot laws call it?

I don't make these laws. I undergo these laws. And this is not the laws I want. And this is not the laws of the country in wich I believe.

I don't make these laws. I undergo these laws. And this is not the laws I want. And this is not the laws of the country in wich I believe.

I feel sorry for you my photoshopping friend, but you are a rare breed.

Why do you think so few care that the State treats them like serfs?

Why no protests like you guys do for every other issue?

You guys will protest the reduction in subsides for street mimes, but nothing when the government tramples your rights.

Amazing.

A suggestion regarding karma fines against French posters of Airbus threads.

I believe every man should get one chance, one freebie. For a first offense, just change their avatar to the Boeing corporate logo for a month. This would effectively result in them giving Boeing free advertising every time they posted a comment on any subject for the next 30 days.

Also, while the German government has paid out billions since 1945 in reparations to their Holocaust victims, the French have tried to pretend, despite unquestionable evidence, that they were innocent of such crimes against humanity. Simple justice demands that something be done. Therefore, I think that karma taken from Frenchmen be placed in the account of our Jewish members.

This would not only be a small step in helping the French come to terms with their sordid past, but it would be amusing watching Fredmasse suddenly begin pretending he's Jewish as a karma-whoring ploy.

Airbus tax: French members who post or reply to an Airbus/EADS thread will be taxed 1K

How about Airpig/EATS ? .... That doesn't count, does it ?

By the way, JLS, .... That has to be one of the NASTIEST avitars ever posted. .... For Christ's sake, ... give that thing a shot of peniscillin.

Is the FF Fruitcake aka watcha exempt?

If you really want to apply French law on this site, Jerry, you must wait for the "décrets d'applications". It can last for long...

Meantime :

Chirac est un escroc ! Un voleur ! Un menteur ! Le pire président de toute l'histoire de France !




RC

JLS


I am in shambles. Will you consider it violence if I post Danica Patrick's U TUBE videos when she beats the shit out of male drivers? On wheels, of course.

Thanks in advance for your leniency and comprehensive attitude. I mean, after all, she is an American icon!

Why do you think so few care that the State treats them like serfs?

Why no protests like you guys do for every other issue?

You guys will protest the reduction in subsides for street mimes, but nothing when the government tramples your rights.

Amazing.

What can I do? Taking my gun and make war? Against a VITAL card? To put a bomb like your extremists at Oklaoma City? Since 1940, this country walk on the head. De Gaulle didn't want to fight the communist in 1945. And we pay it today.

MALBARRE


De Gaulle was a communists, dummy! His best friends was André Malraux, of the International Brigades.

According to the American Law, every United-Statian who posts military pics without arùy autorisation can be sued under the 1917 Espionage law and be send to a martial court.

because you need a spacegoat

You mean rosbif?

(fwaaance inmates of ff.com must enjoy eating one rosbif sandwich per day.)

Now your're thinking Arby's. Mmmmmmm, Arby's.

I agree Jerry that it makes sense to implement laws on this website. Please coulod we also implement the following USA laws:

# In Hillsboro, Oregon, it is unlawful to allow a horse to ride around in the back seat of your car.

# In Portland, Oregon, it is illegal to wear roller skates in public rest rooms.

# Alaska says it's against the law to look at a moose from an airplane.

# In Ft. Huachuca, Arizona, hunting buffalo on the parade ground is against the law.

# Prichard, Alabama, forbids loud talking.

# Also Macomb, Illinois law makes it illegal for a car to impersonate a wolf.

# It is against the law to pawn your wooden leg in Delaware.

# A Zeigler, Illiniois, law states that only the first four firemen reaching a fire will be paid for their services.

# New York has a law forbidding blind men from driving automobiles.

# Washington law says that a driver of a car not equipped with ash trays is liable to a fine of two hundred dollars.

# In Anderson, South Carolina, it is illegal for anyone to curl up on the railroad tracks to take a nap.

# The Utah state code holds that birds have the right of way on public highways.

# It is illegal for anyone to ride his or her bicycle backward on the main streets of Forgan, Oklahoma.

# In Lawrence, Kansas, you can't carry bees around in you hat on the city streets.

# In Kansas City, it is illegal for a minor to purchase a cap gun, but they can however buy a shotgun.

# It is illegal to walk an elephant down Market Street without a leash, in San Francisco.

# In Atlanta it is prohibited by law to dres or undress mannikins in public, or in store windows without pulling down a shade first.

# New Hampshire law forbids you to yap your foot, nod your head, or in any way keep time to music in a tavern, restaurant, or cafe.

# In Grand Rapids, Michigan a law provides a fine for "embracing or being embraced while a car is in motion".

# You can't sell snakes on the streets in California.

# It is illegal in Nebraska to picnic twice on the same spot within any thirty-day period.

# In Santa Ana, Califorina, it is unlawful to pass a fire truck while riding a bicycle.

# New York City law states that all whiskers worn in public by Santa Clause must be fireproof. (Santa's on Fire!!!!!)

# In Anchorage, Alaska, it is the law that every year all male residents shall raise beards from January 5th to the middle of February, when a celebration called the Fur Rendezvous is held.

# Beards more than two and a half feet long are forbidden by law in Altoona, Pennsylvania.

# In Georgia, it is considered a misdemeanor for anyone to attend church on Sundays without a loaded rifle.

# In Chicago, it is against the law to eat in a place that is on fire.

Fredmasse's first pretended to be a shrink. He admires Sigmund Freud!

Ta gueule Watcha. On sait très bien qui tu es et ça vaut pas mieux.


Don't worry, Madame Bourdelle, this is the Police Française.

While you did find plenty of stupid laws brasher, please explain how ANY of them can be broken on an internet message board. That's where your list and the frog laws differ.

JLS talking about rules, it's a bit like Pinochet making a speech about human rights!

"Americans of course are not affected by this new rule, our First Ammendment prevents such facist laws."


Do you know all the laws of the fifty States moron ?
In USA, you have States Law and Federal Laws. And a totally different system of jurisprudence.

Like this absurd sex law wich forbidden sosomy in your OWN house. Is it freedom ?


I found a funny one for Mad Poet.

Mail Order Bride Law Brands U.S. Men Abusers
By Wendy McElroy (01/12/06)

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), signed by President Bush on January 5th, contains an almost unnoticed attachment. Subtitle D, also known as the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 (IMBA), will become law when VAWA is enacted. The IMBA is an ostensibly noble measure with a surprising and ominous twist.

The scant attention directed toward the IMBA has been positive. A headline in Washington State's The Daily Herald announced, "Mail-order brides gain protection" with the subtitle "The mother of a murdered immigrant hopes that pending federal legislation will keep foreign brides from abuse, neglect and slavery."

The "murdered immigrant" refers to Anastasia King, a 'mail-order bride' from the former Soviet Union. In 2000, King was murdered by her husband in Washington State where the case created a sensation largely because the husband had violently assaulted a previous mail-order bride. Thus, the IMBA was introduced to Congress by Washington State Rep. Rick Larsen and Sen. Maria Cantwell who championed the measure for years.

Some parts sound reasonable. For example, U.S. consulates will provide 'mail-order' brides with brochures that explain their legal rights.

Other parts sound draconian. For example, the IMBA requires American men who wish to correspond with foreign women through private for-profit matchmaking agencies to first provide those businesses with their police records and other personal information to be turned over to the women.

Corresponding with a foreigner is legal. Marrying a foreigner is legal. Immigrating spouses and their husbands go through rigorous and lengthy screening before visas are issued. Mail-order brides in the U.S. are protected by laws against violence.

Now American men who wishes to pursue a legal activity must release their government files to a foreign business and foreign individuals for their personal benefit.

(Note: the Act's language is gender-neutral but its clear purpose is to protect foreign women from predatory American men. Application to 'male-order' husbands would be incidental as such 'brides' are relatively rare.)

The disclosure requirement is detailed under the provision entitled "Obligations of International Marriage Broker With Respect to Mandatory Collection of Information."

An international broker cannot provide contact or general information on a foreign woman to an American man unless that broker first collects and discloses to the woman the following information about the man:

--every state of residence since the age of 18;
--current or previous marriages as well as how and when they terminated;
--information on children under 18;
--any arrest or conviction related to controlled substances, alcohol or prostitution, making no distinction on arrests not leading to conviction;
--any court orders, including temporary restraining orders which are notoriously easy to procure;
--any arrest or conviction for crimes ranging from "homicide" to "child neglect";
--any arrest or conviction for "similar activity in violation of Federal, State or local criminal law" without specifying what "similar" means.

U.S. law will provide foreign women with extensive government information on American suitors which is not similarly offered to American women.

Nor should it be.

Contacting a woman for romantic purposes -- internationally or domestically -- is not a crime. Those who do so are not apriori criminals who must prove themselves innocent before being allowed an email exchange.

How many American men will be impacted by the IMBA? According to Rep. Larsen, between 8,000 and 12,000 American men find foreign wives through for-profit brokers each year. Presumably, a considerably higher number attempt but fail to find a wife who successfully emigrates.

Next to no statistics are available on how many 'mail-order' marriages are happy. A report on "the problem" by CBS accurately states, "No firm statistics exist on the extent of abuse suffered by mail-order brides, or even the numbers of such women."

The few media accounts that provided background for the IMBA referred to two 'mail-order brides' who were murdered: Anastasia King in 2000, and Susanna Blackwell in 1995. The murders are deplorable.

But no solid foundation of data underlies Sen. Cantwell's claim of "a growing epidemic of domestic abuse among couples who meet through a broker." There is no reason to believe that violence against mail-order brides is higher than against women in general. No evidence supports the criminalization of every American man who looks overseas for a wife.

And, yet, such men are easy targets. Men who seek wives abroad often explicitly state that women here are not worth marrying because they are too independent, ruined by feminism, or 'fill in the pejorative blank.' If some of those ideal wives subsequently say "goodbye" at the first glimpse of a green card, I can't muster much sympathy.

What I do sympathize with, however, are the privacy rights of people who are considered guilty until proven innocent. This is especially true when a government violates the privacy of its own citizens to benefit foreign individuals.

What view of the American man does the IMBA broadcast to the world?

American men are so predatory and violent that the U.S. government must protect foreign women by providing police checks before allowing the men to say "hello." The "Ugly American" has become an article of federal law, supported by Congress.

Going Down Down South: Fighting Absurd Sex Laws

Playboy, April 1998

By Chuck Shepherd.

Abstract: Activist Howard Fletcher intentionally engaged in illicit sex in Florida to challenge the state's repressive laws on sex. As in a number of other states, Florida defines sodomy in vague terms that make the law hard to follow.

If Howard Fletcher, co-founder of the National Sexual Rights Council, has his way, spring-breakers will want to stay out of Florida this year. Too dangerous. Maybe they should head to Iowa. Or South Dakota. Surf's lame, but at least those states aren't weighed down by 19th century sex laws that turn sexually active tourists (and residents) into criminals.

Florida laws prohibit living together, sex outside of marriage and sodomy (defined as "any unnatural and lascivious act"). The sodomy statute also notes, inexplicably, that "a mother's breast-feeding of her baby does not violate this section."

The fact that the state of Florida included this exception suggests that any combination of mouth and breast not involving an infant violates the code. One wonders what law-abiding citizens do for foreplay in Florida.

Sodomy laws in Florida and in many other states are notoriously vague, a sign of the generally upright demeanor of sexually challenged lawmakers. An exception was the code in the District of Columbia, which showed the dangers of being too specific. Until recently it stipulated that carnal copulation was forbidden not only in the mouth and anus but in any opening of the body other than the vagina. So much for nostril sex or for inserting anything but a Q-Tip into your ear. Was such behavior a serious problem in the capital?

A more important question is: Do the punishments fit the crimes?

If convicted under Florida's antisex laws, which treat cohabitation, fornication and sodomy as misdemeanors, you could face up to 60 days in jail. By some standards, that's progressive. Thirteen states still consider sodomy a felony; some call it an "abominable and detestable crime against nature." Go down on your date in Michigan and you could spend 15 years up the river.

French members who insult homosexuals, even in PMs, will be banned. (Atlantic's Law)

ROFLMAO

An interesting sport to watch: which frog will rat on another frog first. Pitiful frogs started to post some ridiculous 200 years old LOCAL ordinances. Does not compute, morons. This is your NATIONAL law and you are going to live with it. Well, for you it does not make any difference.

shut the fuck up, ukrainian nazi whore.