November 23, 2008, 5:44 AM : Please sign in or register for a free account. Get information about membership.
. . . New: Prediction Market Who's chatting now:
Forum: Flames

Public Reply to The Anti Man Thread

FrogFryer wrote:


Lifes not expendable ? sure it is you wouldnt kill for your family ? but ya just said you would hurt people who hurt your daughter? now i dont understand you jag


'Life is not expendable' was an expression of a moral view. We both know there are those who treat life as if it were very cheap - that doesn't mean we believe that view to be right. Duty can sometimes require that we kill, but it doesn't mean that we are required to do it lightly or be forevermore bereft of some feeling of remorse for having taken another life.

Defend, yes, of course, but at commensurate levels. That can be done verbally, in writing, legally, by limited physical means depending on the seriousness of the threat. Defense by killing is only justified if the opposite threat has risen to the same level.

I did not use the word hurt. I used the word defend. She could be attacked verbally, and defended verbally, no hurt required.




FrogFryer wrote:

EXACTLY Now what if she was a drug addict whore, Or just a bitch who buried sweet guys and Maybe got hers one day from someone like the OLD me. or maybe she was one of the bi sexual lesbians who taught me how to make women squirt in 1992? was that your angel?


I think the phrase 'bi sexual lesbians' is self contradictory. More importantly using disparaging terms about people you were intimately involved with simply might not reflect well upon yourself.


FrogFryer wrote:

NO because you raised her right , she earned the respect of people around her . like no matter what she was feeling sexualy MAYBE at a party when her boyfriend wasnt around MAYBE she didnt FUCK the whole room . or maybe SHE didnt bend over after a business meeting OR she didnt pick up a guy every night at a bar?


The respect should be there a priori, much as everyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

If she had personal problems, I'd still stand by her, and defend her against verbal and physical attack. If I were to do otherwise I'd have forgotten the lesson I taught about the glass being half full and how to make lemonade when life handed me lemon.



FrogFryer wrote:

This is great and all jag BUT your talkin about hurting people again . its not clickin


Again, I used the word defend. We are dealing in words here. I see no physical attacks taking place. A tactful verbal defense against a verbal assault need not cause hurt.

ReplySendWatch


. . . Return to Top of Page

Comments are the responsibility of the author. © Copyright FuckFrance.com
Powered by freedom engine

Terms of Service
Frequently Asked Questions