Top News

Bush will attack Iran

JERUSALEM, July 20 (UPI) -- An unnamed Israeli security official claims U.S. President George Bush will attack Iran late this year if talks on the Mideast nation's nuclear program falter.

The Israeli Web site DEBKAfile.com, quoting Israel National Radio, reported Sunday that a "highly placed security-political" official said Bush would order the attack between Nov. 4, the date of the U.S. presidential election, and his last day in office in January 2009 should Iran not agree to abandon its efforts to enrich uranium.

DEBKAfile.com said the official made the statement shortly after Saturday's talks between Western powers and Iran in Geneva ended in a deadlock.

www.upi.com . . .

A shooting war right before the November elections would possibly scare the voters into wanting the tougher political party (Republicans) instead of their mommy (the Democratic Party) to lead them.

With a war going on hopefully voters would prefer to have a highly decorated combat veteran as commander and chief (John McCain) instead of someone who never stepped foot on a military base until after he became a US Senator only two years ago (Barack Hussein Obama).

DEBKAfile.org is the National Enquirer of political blogs.
you know it's bullshit, but you cant help looking through it at the check-out line.

The source may be questionable, but the strategy is not.

Don't worry, kava, you'll have plenty of time to tell your relatives to get the fuck out of Iran before November.

Better pray they're not aligned with the ruling party, it's going to be a bloodbath post-attack on the regime, and not by our ground forces...but your own people.

Popcorn is ready to go.

I don't believe it, much as I would like to.

Don't worry, kava, you'll have plenty of time to tell your relatives to get the fuck out of Iran before November.

Better pray they're not aligned with the ruling party, it's going to be a bloodbath post-attack on the regime, and not by our ground forces...but your own people.

you must be that DEBKAfile "highly placed security-political" official.

any news on madonna and a-rod?

Is that it Girly Man?

The truth is that if Obama is elected he will let Iran have the bomb. It is that simple. Remember that billy jeff let TWO countries go nuclear during his reign and he was completely surprised by it. The democrats will unilaterally disarm the USA while allowing rogue regimes to get nuclear arms. This is how much they hate the USA.

jukinj3 wrote:

The truth is that if Obama is elected he will let Iran have the bomb. It is that simple. Remember that billy jeff let TWO countries go nuclear during his reign and he was completely surprised by it. The democrats will unilaterally disarm the USA while allowing rogue regimes to get nuclear arms. This is how much they hate the USA.

You better believe it.

Take care of the murdering islamic fascists in Iran first then take care of thier willing slaves the appeasing french.

FUCK france!

If you want to know what stupid is, I mean real stupid, just click on this thread and read all those that believe this story has credibility.

in Iran first then take care of thier willing slaves the appeasing french.

I am a French, proud of it and I shit on you GROS CON

Sooooo, with too few troops in Iraq and too few troops in Afghanistan, you knuckledraggers are now convinced that President Syntax will open up a third front in the War on Terror in Iran? Just how stupid are you people?

Canuk wrote:

Sooooo, with too few troops in Iraq and too few troops in Afghanistan, you knuckledraggers are now convinced that President Syntax will open up a third front in the War on Terror in Iran? Just how stupid are you people?

At first Bush was to dumb, now Bush is to smart. So Dumb Ass which is it?

At first Bush was to dumb, now Bush is to smart. So Dumb Ass which is it?

Chevy is both the dumbest and not the smartest. Congrats champ, you are the top Moran on this thread.

"At first Bush was to dumb, now Bush is to smart. So Dumb Ass which is it?"

Where have I EVER said that "Bush is too smart?" It wasn't a long post and I didn't use many big words, so I don't understand how easily you became so confused. Wait, I take that back...

You're nearly limitless entertainment, ledzep. By all means, keep it up.

You're nearly limitless entertainment, ledzep. By all means, keep it up.

ROFLMAO, he even puts the pic up of his fellow GOP'er hahahaha.

Nice Dabal, nice.

Sooooo, with too few troops in Iraq and too few troops in Afghanistan, you knuckledraggers are now convinced that President Syntax will open up a third front in the War on Terror in Iran?

Now what makes you think that the USA would be putting "boots on the ground" to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities? Unlike Iraq, the goal with Iran is not regime change,.... well, at least by US forces.

They have more to fear from their own citizens turning on them then they do US troops crossing the border

"Now what makes you think that the USA would be putting "boots on the ground" to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities? Unlike Iraq, the goal with Iran is not regime change,.... well, at least by US forces."

What makes you think we can destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities by air? And the Iranian fear that their citizens will turn on their own government? That was the exact same propoganda used by Rummy and the Neocons to convince us that invading Iraq would be a walk in the park, with Iraqi citizens showering our troops with flowers....c'mon, fool me once...

A Vote for Obama...

Is a Vote for Osama.

it may be stupid, but at least it rhymes.

ledzep wrote:


Chevy is both the dumbest and not the smartest. Congrats champ, you are the top Moran on this thread.

Too easy...

What makes you think we can destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities by air?

We? Do you mean Gay UN detachments are going to participate?

Industrial installations and roads could be easily destroyed from the air. But there is no need - a blockade will do Iran in in a matter of months.

ledzep wrote:

If you want to know what stupid is, I mean real stupid, just click on this thread and read all those that believe this story has credibility.

If we really wanted to read something stupid, we would read your posts lunkhead.

How's that technology company and porsche going? You still bragging about that great Ivan technology and how the US would lose the vast majority of its air assets if we attacked iran?

When are you going to post pictures of yourself in your new girly car? Did you get a free box of tampons with it?

What makes you think we can destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities by air?

WE can't - the USA can. They can't bury them deep enough or build them hard enough to survive what the US has in store for them.

Keep in mind that last October, the Pentigon requested and was approved for $88 million to modify several B2 bombers so that they could accomidate "Big Blue".

"Big Blue," is a 13.6 ton heavy operation bunker buster developed with Iran’s deeply buried nuclear facilities in mind.

It was developed just for this purpose.

That's what makes me think "we" can destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities by air.