May 17, 2012, 4:42 AM : Please sign in or register for a free account. Get information about membership.
. . . New: ... Pay to change the logo for six hours Who's chatting now:
News: World




World
Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 4)  en>fr fr>en
By kava_kava Comments: 6541, member since Thu May 12, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 08:30 AM
i got nothing to say

BEIJING — A bias in favor of male offspring has left China with 32 million more boys under the age of 20 than girls, creating “an imminent generation of excess men,” a study released Friday said.

In 2005, a new study found, births of boys in China exceeded births of girls by more than 1.1 million. There were 120 boys born for every 100 girls.

For the next 20 years, China will have increasingly more men than women of reproductive age, according to the paper, which was published online by the British Medical Journal. “Nothing can be done now to prevent this,” the researchers said.

Chinese government planners have long known that the urge of couples to have sons was skewing the gender balance of the population. But the study, by two Chinese university professors and a London researcher, provides some of the first hard data on the extent of the disparity and the factors contributing to it.

In 2005 , they found, births of boys in China exceeded births of girls by more than 1.1 million. There were 120 boys born for every 100 girls.

This disparity seems to surpass that of any other country, they said — a finding, they wrote, that was perhaps unsurprising in light of China’s one-child policy.

They attributed the imbalance almost entirely to couples’ decisions to abort female fetuses.

The trend toward more male than female children intensified steadily after 1986, they said, as ultrasound tests and abortion became more available. “Sex-selective abortion accounts for almost all the excess males,” the paper said.

The researchers, who analyzed data from a 2005 census, said the disparity was widest among children ages 1 to 4, a sign that the greatest imbalances among the adult population lie ahead. They also found more distortion in provinces that allow rural couples a second child if the first is a girl, or in cases of hardship.

Those couples were determined to ensure they had at least one son, the researchers noted. Among children born second, there were 143 boys for 100 girls, the data showed.

The Chinese government is openly concerned “about the consequences of large numbers of excess men for social stability and security,” the researchers said.

But “although some imaginative and extreme solutions have been suggested,” they wrote, China will have too many men for a generation to come.

They said enforcing the ban against sex-selective abortions could normalize the sex ratio in the future.

The study was conducted by Wei Xingzhu, a Zhejiang Normal University professor; Li Lu, a Zhejiang University professor; and Therese Hesketh, a University College London lecturer.

19 Replies to Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million

re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 4)  en>fr fr>en
By Hercules Comments: 1513, member since Wed Dec 31, 2003
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 09:32 AM
I guess basic math isn't a strong suit in the Chinese Government?

They are all trying to get to Vancouver, Canada.

In the meantime, don't buy any Asian Sauces from China.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By Tiberius Comments: 7402, member since Tue Feb 11, 2003
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:04 AM
Edited by Tiberius (56178) on 2009-04-13 10:13:26
Given the tendency of minions serving Totalitarian Regimes to send up the numbers they think thier bosses want to see, not to mention the reluctance of Beijing to "lose face" by admitting they are solely responsible for creating this demographic crisis.....it's probably a lot worse than they are reporting.


kava_kava wrote:


They said enforcing the ban against sex-selective abortions could normalize the sex ratio in the future.


Dropping the stupid "One Child" policy that brought them to this situation would normalize it faster. I have to wonder what they are thinking in Beijing...if there is a general revolt against the Regime, it will probably be sparked by one of the ham-fisted enforcement actions the paramilitaries of the "Family Planning" agency routinely indulge in out in the countryside.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 2)  en>fr fr>en
By A_Thinking_Man Comments: 15842, member since Fri May 16, 2003
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:33 AM
They attributed the imbalance almost entirely to couples’ decisions to abort female fetuses.

I bet NOW and all those other dyke organizations still think communism is awesome.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By kava_kava Comments: 6541, member since Thu May 12, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:47 AM
same problem in india. except that instead of one child policy there's the bride dowry system. girls are too expensive for the poor to raise.
the result? killing of infant girls by their families resulting in a greater boy to girl ratio.

yep. interesting times ahead in asia.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 9)  en>fr fr>en
By poupon_le_french Comments: 19828, member since Thu Jul 24, 2003
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 AM
Shitloads of little boys?

No wonder kava's interest was peaked.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By MadRusski Comments: 29526, member since Mon Aug 16, 2004
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:01 AM
In Asia, cretin? Such gender imbalance historically means war. Get some butt lube, time for you to get lucky, retard
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million en>fr fr>en
By kava_kava Comments: 6541, member since Thu May 12, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:04 AM
uhm, ok. do you have a question?
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By BlueCollarUSA Comments: 1646, member since Fri Jul 07, 2006
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:28 AM
kava_kava wrote:

uhm, ok. do you have a question?


Yes. Why are you such a limp-wristed queer?
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By kava_kava Comments: 6541, member since Thu May 12, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:51 AM
Image hotlink - 'http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a277/kava_kava/Monkeyboy.jpg'
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 2)  en>fr fr>en
By idahoboy Comments: 3374, member since Sat Sep 16, 2006
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 01:49 PM
A pussy shortage is in the works. Not a good thing.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million en>fr fr>en
By Tiberius Comments: 7402, member since Tue Feb 11, 2003
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 02:00 PM
idahoboy wrote:

A pussy shortage is in the works. Not a good thing.


They'll probably cut off letting foreigners adopt Chinese children....they lose a lot of girls that way too.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million en>fr fr>en
By mahalo Comments: 15789, member since Sat Nov 15, 2003
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 04:03 PM
Weird,, cause the rest of the world is not interested in Chinese men.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By Global_Villagemember has saluted, click to view salute photos Comments: 6820, member since Sun Aug 07, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 04:45 PM
creating “an imminent generation of excess men,”


Good days ahead for Vaseline products in china...
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 2)  en>fr fr>en
By Fearless_Leader Comments: 15580, member since Thu Dec 09, 2004
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 05:05 PM
Edited by Fearless_Leader (75698) on 2009-04-13 17:07:27
Good days ahead for Vaseline products in china...

Actually, a generation of sexually frustrated young men with no mates, no prospects, no jobs and no shoes is a perfect recipe for a vast army of cannon fodder that can be paid with a bowl of rice per day and a new set of clothes...and they will march
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million en>fr fr>en
By MadRusski Comments: 29526, member since Mon Aug 16, 2004
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 05:12 PM
creating “an imminent generation of excess men,”


Good days ahead for Vaseline products in china


You think they will bring their own to Fwance? last time French men provided their own to Germans
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million en>fr fr>en
By FrogBites Comments: 1154, member since Mon Nov 14, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 06:25 PM
If this isn't a formula for a huge demographic of homo assmasters then I don't know what is.
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 2)  en>fr fr>en
By trainer Comments: 4231, member since Tue Mar 29, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 08:38 PM
Actually, a generation of sexually frustrated young men with no mates, no prospects, no jobs and no shoes is a perfect recipe for a vast army of cannon fodder


There is a joke from the countries surrounding China...

KNOCK KNOCK

Who's There?

CHINESE SOLDIER

Chinese Soldier Who?

IS THAT ANY WAY TO TALK TO YOUR SON-IN-LAW?
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million en>fr fr>en
By MsBehavePremium member Comments: 6767, member since Sat Apr 02, 2005
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:24 PM
FrogBites wrote:

If this isn't a formula for a huge demographic of homo assmasters then I don't know what is.

Why else do you think kaka_kaka started this thread? :D
re: Chinese Bias for Baby Boys Creates a Gap of 32 Million (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By NickDanger Comments: 57, member since Tue Jul 01, 2008
On Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:27 PM
Chinese food is okay.

I get hungry later, though



I like pho. That is vietnamese for soup.

ReplySendWatch

Advertise Here

The Ban Chronicles

ArthurH banned Fredmasse for 48 hours on Thu Apr 26 10:39 with the message 'popular request'

Antiricain banned WilyB for 48 hours on Thu Apr 26 08:21 with the message 'expatrié sarkozyste.Traître à la nation française'

Antiricain banned jeanv for 48 hours on Thu Apr 26 07:45 with the message 'VIVE LE PEN !'

ArthurH banned shon for 48 hours on Wed Apr 25 02:10 with the message 'simple test'

shon banned webmaster for 24 hours at Sun Apr 22 23:51 with the message 'Because webmaster has not contributed anything useful or amusing to the site'




. . . Return to Top of Page