March 16, 2010, 1:19 PM : Please sign in or register for a free account. Get information about membership.
. . . New: Prediction Market Who's chatting now:
News: UK

Page: ( 1 )2



UK
savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 6)  en>fr fr>en
By idahoboy Comments: 3650, member since Sat Sep 16, 2006
On Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:54 PM
Muzzie "Santa" not related to story. Just needed picture of a Muzzie.

BRITISH Asian crime gangs are behind an explosion in an extreme form of dog fighting.

The savage craze ignores old “rules” on weight, meaning dogs are often torn to bits by bigger opponents.


And investigators are struggling to keep up with the rise of the sick pastime among British-born Pakistani gangs which are also
involved in guns and drugs.


Mike Butcher, chief inspector of special operations at the RSPCA, said: “The most serious injuries I’ve seen have been from fights run by this community.


“You get whole faces ripped off, bottom jaws missing, eyes out, legs broken. The dogs might just be left to fight to the death.


“They don’t enforce the rules as strictly as the old school dog fighters who would be very firm making sure dogs weighed the same.


“It’s a bit more of a free for all. You’ve got mismatches which make for a much more bloody fight.”


It is thought the gangs inherited their love of the cruel sport from Pakistan where it is legal.


But instead of training the bully kutta breed used for fighting in Asia they import pitbulls, often from Croatia.


The outlawed animals are capable of killing rottweilers within minutes. Once their jaws are locked on an opponent they can only be prised off with a stick or by strangling the beast until it passes out.


In the last two years, 60 British Asians have been jailed for dog fighting, said Mr Butcher.


Up to £20,000 can be wagered on a single fight.


Last November Liaquat Ali, 40, from Accrington, Lancashire, became the first person prosecuted under tougher laws banning organised dog fights when he was jailed for six months.


In October 2007 seven Birmingham men were caged for organising one of the bloodiest and longest dog fights ever.


Two animals died after suffering 124 separate injuries while fighting for hours in a makeshift pit in a kitchen showroom in Alum Rock, Birmingham.

32 Replies to savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz

re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By devadevadasamember has saluted, click to view salute photos Comments: 3116, member since Thu Nov 10, 2005
On Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:00 PM
...60 British Asians...



proudcunt?
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 7)  en>fr fr>en
By Dewi_Sant Comments: 17306, member since Wed Jul 06, 2005
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 02:17 AM



sorry Mods I just couldn't resist - this is a much better pic of a muzz
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 4)  en>fr fr>en
By PuppyKisses Comments: 1127, member since Tue Sep 16, 2008
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 05:46 AM
That is so awful!! the men who do that to those poor dogs
need to be castrated with no anesthetic.

I love dogs and it truly saddens me knowing that dog fighting
is legal in some places. It's always been my thought that if
a person abuses animals, they will eventually abuse a person.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 7)  en>fr fr>en
By indigo2 Comments: 4255, member since Tue Sep 16, 2003
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 05:51 AM
Edited by indigo2 (73564) on 2009-06-29 05:51:59
Remember:
- Allah is not God
- Mohammed was not a good man
- Islam is not a religion
- Muslims are not citizens

Muslims hates dogs more than they hate non-muslims. Dogs refuse to convert to Islam. In all history not a single dog converted to islam. Good boy.

Deport all muslims from Great Britain. Do it now.

Fuck france!
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By Lord_Buckhouse Comments: 460, member since Wed May 27, 2009
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 06:04 AM
I would love to set this goat fuckers beard on fire
and then throw him into a pit of rabid dogs....
Image hotlink - 'http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i413/158969.715muzz_santa.jpg'
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By JacquesOff Comments: 2324, member since Sun May 09, 2004
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 06:20 AM
Lord_Buckhouse wrote:

I would love to set this goat fuckers beard on fire
and then throw him into a pit of rabid dogs....
Image hotlink - 'http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i413/158969.715muzz_santa.jpg'


Wasn't that guy the lost fourth member of ZZ Top who was kicked out for artistic differences?
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By Wulfrun Comments: 1977, member since Tue Jun 10, 2008
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 08:57 AM
Edited by Wulfrun (81633) on 2009-06-29 08:59:04
Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.

In the old days using animals for sports and entertainment was common: cock fights, bull-baiting, hare-coursing, and of course fox hunting - all banned by the pussy PC brigade. They'll be banning angling and insecticides next.

Kudos to these British Asians for not knuckling under to squeamish do-gooders. Animals aren't human and don't feel pain the same way as people. It's their destiny to die in order to feed, serve or amuse humans.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 5)  en>fr fr>en
By Johnny_Ola Comments: 2802, member since Sat Apr 28, 2007
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 09:04 AM
Wulfrun wrote:

Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.

In the old days using animals for sports and entertainment was common: cock fights, bull-baiting, hare-coursing, and of course fox hunting - all banned by the pussy PC brigade. They'll be banning angling and insecticides next.

Kudos to these British Asians for not knuckling under to squeamish do-gooders. Animals aren't human and don't feel pain the same way as people. It's their destiny to die in order to feed, serve or amuse humans.


This has to be a troll. Nobody is this stupid.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By Johnny_Ola Comments: 2802, member since Sat Apr 28, 2007
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 09:06 AM
Leave it to the muzzies to take an already barbaric "sport" and make it about preying on the weak and overmatched. Muzzies don't have the stomach for a fair fight because they always lose.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By Wulfrun Comments: 1977, member since Tue Jun 10, 2008
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 09:11 AM
Johnny_Ola wrote:

This has to be a troll. Nobody is this stupid.


Not good enough: you have to say exactly what you think is stupid, and exactly why! Use logic, not sentimentality.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 11)  en>fr fr>en
By Johnny_Ola Comments: 2802, member since Sat Apr 28, 2007
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 09:43 AM
Johnny_Ola wrote:

This has to be a troll. Nobody is this stupid.


Wulfrun wrote:

Not good enough: you have to say exactly what you think is stupid, and exactly why! Use logic, not sentimentality.


Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.It is unnatural for dogs of any size to be made to fight each other. Dogs fight over breeding and food, but generally only until dominance can be determined--not to the death. In dog fights, they fight for their masters, not themselves.

In the old days using animals for sports and entertainment was common: cock fights, bull-baiting, hare-coursing, and of course fox hunting - all banned by the pussy PC brigade. They'll be banning angling and insecticides next. Gladitorial human combat was also common in the old days. What is your point?

Kudos to these British Asians for not knuckling under to squeamish do-gooders. Animals aren't human and don't feel pain the same way as people. It's their destiny to die in order to feed, serve or amuse humans.These statements are inherently stupid. No further explanation is needed.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By FuhkFrenchToads Comments: 2010, member since Thu Sep 01, 2005
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:02 PM
Wulfrun wrote:

Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.

In the old days using animals for sports and entertainment was common: cock fights, bull-baiting, hare-coursing, and of course fox hunting - all banned by the pussy PC brigade. They'll be banning angling and insecticides next.

Kudos to these British Asians for not knuckling under to squeamish do-gooders. Animals aren't human and don't feel pain the same way as people. It's their destiny to die in order to feed, serve or amuse humans.


Actually, you are right about one thing: Animals aren't human. In fact, because you can dissect an animal and study their nervous system, we know that some of them are incapable of seeing colors. We also know that they can smell things far better than we can. But the same studies that have been done to study the nervous system of animals, concludes that they do feel pain. In fact, lots of pain.

As for sports, they were created for the purpose of having a competition of skills done in a match. But sports were not matches in which one opponent had to kill another. As for fishing and hunting, I remind you that they are considered "FISHING AND HUNTING" And those are not sports. They are not regulated by a major league, or an olympic committee. In fact, they are regulated by the states, and enforced by the ATF. So, fishing and hunting are definitely "outdoor activities" but they are not sports.

It is dowright cruel to kill dogs this way.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 3)  en>fr fr>en
By pippin Comments: 1289, member since Mon Jan 19, 2009
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:06 PM
Wulfrun wrote:

Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.

In the old days using animals for sports and entertainment was common: cock fights, bull-baiting, hare-coursing, and of course fox hunting - all banned by the pussy PC brigade. They'll be banning angling and insecticides next.

Kudos to these British Asians for not knuckling under to squeamish do-gooders. Animals aren't human and don't feel pain the same way as people. It's their destiny to die in order to feed, serve or amuse humans.
:(You deluded prick. Of course they feel pain like humans. Just tread on a pitbull's paw and find out the hard way! Animals should be treated with respect, just like us.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 1)  en>fr fr>en
By Proust Comments: 144, member since Tue Nov 27, 2007
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:44 PM
Wulfrun wrote:

Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.

In the old days using animals for sports and entertainment was common: cock fights, bull-baiting, hare-coursing, and of course fox hunting - all banned by the pussy PC brigade. They'll be banning angling and insecticides next.

Kudos to these British Asians for not knuckling under to squeamish do-gooders. Animals aren't human and don't feel pain the same way as people. It's their destiny to die in order to feed, serve or amuse humans.


Wolfman,sucez moi mon petite pucey!
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 3)  en>fr fr>en
By Dewi_Sant Comments: 17306, member since Wed Jul 06, 2005
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 02:22 PM
Deport all muslims from Great Britain

I am all for that
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By Wulfrun Comments: 1977, member since Tue Jun 10, 2008
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 03:54 PM
Johnny_Ola wrote:

It is unnatural for dogs of any size to be made to fight each other. Dogs fight over breeding and food, but generally only until dominance can be determined--not to the death. In dog fights, they fight for their masters, not themselves.
Unnatural? Man has been breeding dogs for different tasks for millennia, including some are bred to be fighting dogs. And why not? The key lies in the word "master".
Gladitorial human combat was also common in the old days. What is your point?
Gladiators were human, not animals. You appreciate the difference?
These statements are inherently stupid. No further explanation is needed.
What don't you understand about "don't feel pain the same way as people"? "No further explanation is needed"??? You CAN'T explain, you're just being sentimental. We breed and then slaughter lots of animals for food without compunction. Who cares?

Why shouldn't humans be "cruel" (a loaded word!) to animals for their own amusement? It was absolutely normal in Britain, for example, until recent times: bullfights still take place in Spain, foxhunts still take place in Britain, who cares? Or are you one of those PC anti-bloodsports types? Remember, they're just animals. We eat them, we hunt them for fun, we tame/train them to serve us. That's how it's always been, anything else is the pussy do-gooder bullshit propagated by PETA, vegetarians and other nutjobs.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By Wulfrun Comments: 1977, member since Tue Jun 10, 2008
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 03:59 PM
Edited by Wulfrun (81633) on 2009-06-29 16:00:39
FuhkFrenchToads wrote:

the same studies that have been done to study the nervous system of animals, concludes that they do feel pain. In fact, lots of pain.
To differing degrees, yes. But they're animals - it doesn't matter.

As for sports, they were created for the purpose of having a competition of skills done in a match. But sports were not matches in which one opponent had to kill another. As for fishing and hunting, I remind you that they are considered "FISHING AND HUNTING" And those are not sports. They are not regulated by a major league, or an olympic committee. In fact, they are regulated by the states, and enforced by the ATF. So, fishing and hunting are definitely "outdoor activities" but they are not sports.
It's nitpicking to distinguish between "sports" and "outdoor activities" like this. Either way, the animals get killed or at least injured (not that it matters).

It is dowright cruel to kill dogs this way.
"Cruel" doesn't come into it; but it's unsporting. They should have referees on hand to declare the winner and vets to tend the injured dogs - like in boxing matches.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By lord_of_the_air Comments: 2889, member since Sun Nov 14, 2004
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 04:11 PM
What do you expect? This is what muzzy shit like wulfrun do because they are too gay to get some pussy and too stupid to read a book (even the koran) and of course they are too lazy to work.I mean come on....throw those dogs a bone!
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 5)  en>fr fr>en
By GoWestYoungManmember has saluted, click to view salute photos Comments: 7370, member since Sat Oct 16, 2004
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 04:23 PM
It's nitpicking to distinguish between "sports" and "outdoor activities" like this. Either way, the animals get killed or at least injured (not that it matters).


Dude, you are so fucking full of shit I do not even know where to start. I come from a circle of hunters. The animals are hunted for their meat, and not for entertainment value. The idea of killing an animal for pleasure puts you in psycho killer territory for me.

It is repugnant.

Yeah, bullfights, for example. I have seen one in Nice, where 12 bulls were slaughtered one by one by several fags in tight pants. He was only allowed to fight the bulls who were able to deal with the drugs they shot into them first (plenty of them were too stoned to deal with it). I consider it animal abuse. If I want to eat a steak, I want it to be killed quickly and not played with, not drugged, and not bled out before it faces the axe. Fuck you Latin prissy boys. You fags toy with your food like a cat. And fuck you halal/kosher dudes as well.

Hunting. Where I come from you literally hunt for food. I guess your urban personality cannot understand the concept, which is why you try to accentuate your manliness by approving of gratuitous death and torture of animals. Hunting game is all about being responsible, ethical and tracking that deer for 50 miles if necessary. It has nothing to do with enjoying the death or entertainment of critters. It is about bringing food back. Seiously, and I never thought that I would say this, but maybe hunting should be banned because of these sick twisted fuckers like wulfrun.

You are totally fucked in the head.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 2)  en>fr fr>en
By sgian Comments: 2006, member since Wed Jul 09, 2008
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 05:03 PM
Johnny_Ola wrote:


This has to be a troll. Nobody is this stupid.

Wulfrog really is that stupid. The only major difference between wulfrog and a stinky is that it writes English better than a stinky. This allows wulfrog to masquerade as an anglo.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 4)  en>fr fr>en
By BartSimpson Comments: 1048, member since Mon Jul 25, 2005
On Mon Jun 29, 2009 05:56 PM
I'm pretty sure WulfCunt is a parody, no one could be as dumb as he seems to be.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 5)  en>fr fr>en
By feathersmember has saluted, click to view salute photos Comments: 3022, member since Sun Jul 22, 2007
On Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:30 AM
Animals are not human and neither is Wulfrun. Not trace of humanity in his commentary.

If animals speak they will come with a more humane response than yours Wulfrun.

Animals are innocent, they don't hate, they are not cruel like you Wulfrun, they are simply animals and since they are inferior creatures than us, since we are the ones who supposedly reason, they deserve humans treat them with humanity. I think it's very low for humans to take advantage of the innocent character of animals to treat them with cruelty because animals can be wild, but they are never cruel.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz (karma: 2)  en>fr fr>en
By OldCujo Comments: 1694, member since Thu Mar 30, 2006
On Tue Jun 30, 2009 02:39 AM
Driving dog fighting underground leads to these excesses: it's unsporting to pit unmatched dogs against one another, and that happens because the sport isn't regulated properly.

Bullshit. Dog fighting is not a "sport," it's an insane, savage form of animal cruelty. In the US dog fighting is practiced mostly by thugs, gang-bangers, and other human garbage. I don't advocate driving it underground, it would be easier to just shoot the fucks that organize these 'events' and save the cost of a trial. People that deliberately hurt dogs are the lowest form of life on the planet.
re: savage brutes, brutal savages --- uk muzzzzzzz en>fr fr>en
By Wulfrun Comments: 1977, member since Tue Jun 10, 2008
On Tue Jun 30, 2009 02:40 AM
Edited by Wulfrun (81633) on 2009-06-30 03:02:05
Dude, you are so fucking full of shit I do not even know where to start. I come from a circle of hunters. The animals are hunted for their meat, and not for entertainment value. The idea of killing an animal for pleasure puts you in psycho killer territory for me.
First off, you're mistaken about me: I have never been cruel to animals (nor would I ever be), and was arguing for the principle of governments not meddling and banning things which have a counterproductive effect. Did you read the article?
Mike Butcher, chief inspector of special operations at the RSPCA, said: …“They don’t enforce the rules as strictly as the old school dog fighters who would be very firm making sure dogs weighed the same."

For example, boxing went the opposite way, from the old bare-knuckle non-stop beatings with occasional fatalities to a tightly regulated sport with doctors, referees on hand to keep things civilized. If the same standards were to be imposed on dog fighting and other bloodsports, the animals would suffer less.

As it happens, I dislike boxing too. But millions of others are less squeamish and more traditional-minded, and who am I to impose my values on others? The British hunt foxes (not for their meat!), the Spanish kill bulls in the arena. Unlike you, I'd never watch an event like that, but I'm not going to criticise it either. I've never hunted, I also dislike visiting circuses and zoos that keep animals in unsuitable conditions and force them to perform tricks. But millions of people enjoy these activities and see nothing wrong in them.
Yeah, bullfights, for example. I have seen one in Nice, where 12 bulls were slaughtered one by one by several fags in tight pants. He was only allowed to fight the bulls who were able to deal with the drugs they shot into them first (plenty of them were too stoned to deal with it). I consider it animal abuse. If I want to eat a steak, I want it to be killed quickly and not played with, not drugged, and not bled out before it faces the axe. Fuck you Latin prissy boys.
Who, me? :D
And fuck you halal/kosher dudes as well.
Careful now, you'll have FF's porkdodgers at your throat, quoting the Torah and/or the Bible to prove that God demands exactly that method of slaughter.
Where I come from you literally hunt for food.
With all due respect, in today's world that's bullshit. Beef, veal, pork, lamb, poultry from industrial slaughterhouses is readily and cheaply available from supermarkets. People who hunt nowadays hunt for enjoyment.
Hunting game is all about being responsible, ethical and tracking that deer for 50 miles if necessary.
LOL! Running down a panicked animal and putting a bullet (or several) into it is ethical? Quit the hypocrisy: if you really want to eat venison (and why, exactly?), deer could be bred and fed in enclosures and then taken to the slaughterhouse – just like cattle, pigs, lambs, chickens, geese etc. It's more efficient and more humane than hunting. But that doesn't happen, because people enjoy hunting and are willing to accept a messier and more painful death for their prey so they can brag about their skills and maybe nail antlers up on the wall. Ethical, my arse!
I never thought that I would say this, but maybe hunting should be banned because of these sick twisted fuckers like wulfrun.

I wouldn't mind if hunting were to be banned. I wouldn't mind if it was left alone. That's for the electorate to decide, not some pressure group or government bureaucrat.

Incidentally, I find it interesting that I'm accused of being sick and cruel on a board like FF where posters regularly advocate persecution, expulsion, torture, murder etc. of entire human populations, never being contradicted but getting lots of karma. Too funny!
Page: ( 1 )2

ReplySendWatch

Advertise Here




. . . Return to Top of Page