Team of Researchers Blames Children's Films for Perpetuating "Heteronormativity"

Researchers at the University of Michigan have concluded that the love stories told in classic Disney and other G-rated children's films - such as the Little Mermaid - are partially to blame for the pervasiveness of what they label "heteronormativity."

"Despite the assumption that children's media are free of sexual content, our analyses suggest that these media depict a rich and pervasive heterosexual landscape," wrote researchers Emily Kazyak and Karin Martin, in a report published in the latest issue of the Sociologists for Women in Society (SWS) publication Gender & Society.

Kazyak and Martin said they studied the role of heterosexual relationships in several of the highest-grossing G-rated films between 1990-2005. The results, say the researchers, illustrate two ways that the children's films "construct heterosexuality": through "depictions of hetero-romantic love as exceptional, powerful, transformative, and magical," and "depictions of interactions between gendered bodies in which the sexiness of feminine characters is subjected to the gaze of masculine characters."

"Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for - and a link to the naturalness of - hetero-romantic love."

The SWS press release on the research blamed what they called the "old ideals" of romantic relationships, specifically those found the Brothers Grimm fairy tales, which in many instances inspired the films' storylines, for "such heavily gendered depictions and glorified portrayals of heterosexual relationships."

The team says the results point to heterosexuality achieving a "taken-for-granted status" "because hetero-romance is depicted as powerful." "Both ordinary and exceptional constructions of heterosexuality work to normalize its status because it becomes difficult to imagine anything other than this form of social relationship or anyone outside of these bonds," they concluded. "These films provide powerful portraits of a multifaceted and pervasive heterosexuality that likely facilitates the reproduction of heteronormativity."

The SWS press release concluded: "President Obama may have declared June to be Gay Pride Month, but entertainment for children therefore continues to perpetuate a less inclusive message, leaving those outside its confines with little to build their own dreams of happily ever after."

Sexuality expert Dr. Judith Reisman told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) yesterday that the "politically correct" study reveals "the growing dominance of Heterophobia within academia and the spread of heterophobes among female professionals."

"Now, if the Ladies of the Sociology Society think pornography is becoming the heteronorm and that Disney is contributing to that form of what is really Heterophobia, they might have an argument," Reisman noted. "However, the Ladies of the Sociology Society appear to favor Homoerotic child propaganda, as the current academic party line dictates."

www.lifesitenews.com . . .

Researchers at the University of Michigan have concluded that the love stories told in classic Disney and other G-rated children's films - such as the Little Mermaid - are partially to blame for the pervasiveness of what they label "heteronormativity."

My grandfather said it best. "There are a lot of educated fools out there". "Heteronormativity"? What a crock of shit. Since when has faggotry ever been anything but abnormal? What would they have children watch instead of romantic images of a man woman? Two faggots slamming eachother in the ass in the bathroom stall of a gay bar in San Fransicko? I guess that is the kind of "love" they prefer YOUR children to see portrayed.

This is just some sick shit. Who fucking funds this "research," NAMBLA?

Fearless_Leader wrote:

This is just some sick shit. Who fucking funds this "research," NAMBLA?

People without boundaries or a moral compass, that's for sure. But it's all true. Children's films do not promote sodomy, cocksuckers, bestiality or rape. And it will stay that way if the makers of children's programs want to sell their product.

Notice perverts always want to zero in on children and harm the kids with their perversions.

If heterosexuality were not the norm, we wouldn't be here dumbasses. One slackjawed faggot pounding another in the ass only produces hemeroids...not offspring.

Kazyak and Martin said they studied the role of heterosexual relationships in several of the highest-grossing G-rated films between 1990-2005. The results, say the researchers, illustrate two ways that the children's films "construct heterosexuality": through "depictions of hetero-romantic love as exceptional, powerful, transformative, and magical," and "depictions of interactions between gendered bodies in which the sexiness of feminine characters is subjected to the gaze of masculine characters."

"Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for - and a link to the naturalness of - hetero-romantic love."

Freaks

Let’s put this in perspective – Only heterosexual intercourse results in the propagation of the human species. Homosexual sex results in nothing other than sexually transmitted death, and social decay.

Based on the laws of nature, which do you consider “normal” from a logical viewpoint?

Others will think this is harsh or that I’m wrong,… but the way I see it, if you are a fagot and want to live, GET THE FUCK BACK INTO THE CLOSET AND STOP ATTACKING HUMANITY ON A WHOLE.
There should be 10% more fag bludgeoning deaths every year than the year prior.

So its Official:



Muscle/NASCAR cars are male, and Porsche's are girls.

I don't care what someone wants to do with his life really....but don't shove your crap into my face and tell me I have to "accept it" or tell you its "normal" or just as good, etc. No. I don't. Homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end. Those are just the facts whether that happens to be politically fashionable today or not. Only heterosexuality results in children...the propogation of the human race....future workers, warriors, artists and scientists. Societies are built upon families. Anything a society can do to promote the formation of families goes directly toward its long term survival. I don't go out of my way to cause difficulty for homosexuals, but I do not have to buy into the whole PC agenda either. Just live your life, treat others decently and quit trying to shove your agenda down my throat.

I read some sci-fi, way back when the idea of accepted open homosexuality was taboo. The author then took it to the next step of homosexuality being the norm. This was possible because technology made sexual reproduction "obsolete"--test tubes, etc.

Then came cloning. Eventually the entire population of the Earth was comprised of clones of ONE individual.

BTW, this book is being made into a movie.

and quit trying to shove your agenda down my throat


it's not their "agenda" they want 2 shove down your throat it's their man-meat you need 2 watch out for

That team of researchers lied.



Homo bugs.









Mebbe not...



Heterosexual robots.

G-rated to become Gay-friendly?

Homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end.

Spot on. Even the uneducated ancients in the Old Testament INSTINCTIVELY understood this. Queers don't reproduce and multiple. From a Darwinian point of view it's a death sentence. It's UNDENIABLE that men and women were intended, by nature, to be the sexual compliment of the other. It's how we continue to exist as a species. Except to fudgepackers in a state of perverted denial and left wing academicians with twisted political agendas.

These so-called "experts" are becoming less and less relevant, as fewer and fewer people give a sh*t what they say.

TEAM of eRRR says what?

What are they searching?

Maybe they are gays "searching" to be kicked in the aSS...

Women's Gender Studies has to be the most worthless degree available. A science so soft it makes jello look like titanium.

New feminist approved Disney Flicks...

The Many Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh Licker

Bambi, The Transsexual Stripper

Pinocchio and the Glory Hole

Snow White And The Seven Vertically Challenged Life Partners

Sex Toy Story

See my avatar regarding how I feel about giving women authority.

Kike tranny winning Eurovision:

These so-called "experts" are becoming less and less relevant, as fewer and fewer people give a sh*t what they say.

Sorry, dude, wishful thinking. They in fact define the school curriculum and advise on many fucking Govmint boards, from town to Federal. Also on private Cos board cuz those are terrified of being sued. Same like with racial hustlers. Only these cunts are much more devoted to the point of being fanatics.

Kike tranny winning Eurovision:

This is very odd to come from Kiki. From Wikipedia:

Orthodox Jews and others with conservative views were opposed to her appointment and attempted to void her participation in the contest.

Is Kiki a secret Orthodox Kike?

MadRusski wrote:

These so-called "experts" are becoming less and less relevant, as fewer and fewer people give a sh*t what they say.

Sorry, dude, wishful thinking. They in fact define the school curriculum and advise on many fucking Govmint boards, from town to Federal. Also on private Cos board cuz those are terrified of being sued. Same like with racial hustlers. Only these cunts are much more devoted to the point of being fanatics.

Yep. The only way we're gonna get rid of these perverted "experts" is by killing them.

Russians love trannies. And jews. Russians love nothing more than jewish trannies... which explains why madrusski has his tongue up tozer's ass all the time.