TheMadPoet wrote:

balls wrote:

1. Why not just stick to naked adults who are not made to look like naked children?


Extra credit: Why post porn at all?

One more: Do you think anyone is interested in seeing pictures of naked girls made to look underage? If not, why else would you post them?


That's it. I think you should have a good answer to all that, that won't make you appear to be... what they've been calling you.

Trying real hard to give you the benefit of the doubt. Thanks in advance.

You are welcome - in advance.

We all seem to speak fondly of the FF of old, which, when I came here, had "mangina" and fag photoshops and/or photos on what seemed like every third thread, with the "Hotties" thread being the lone bastion of heterosexuality. Something my hetero-hard wired brain could appreciate.

Hey, I like women, no apologies.

I was immediately labeled as a "pedo" before I ever posted a single titty picture, just because my wife is young.

When you get called a pedo 100,000 times, you get numb to the accusation.

FF is and was, also a Karma game, a multi year contest of sorts,which adds to the fun of being here, and boobs = karma.

Lately not so much, with no real K return for titty pictures these days, I don't post as many as I used to, so there is no longer a point to it.

As for porn itself, well, I really could give a shit about posting it at all, but it is amusing to make the brains of retards explode.

The last time I started a non-nude hotties and cars thread, it became a pissing post for everyone who wanted to post my PI, so let's see if the new one can stay on subject.

I was really hoping you'd answer at lease ONE of my questions. I wasn't being obtuse. They're pretty straight forward.

You almost hit one with: "As for porn itself, well, I really could give a shit about posting it at all"

Here they are again. If you would, please answer each one inline so I don't get confused, or, for each one, copy and paste the words in your previous reply that you believe answered it already.

1. Why do you post pictures of naked females made to appear to be naked children?
2. Why not just stick to naked adults who are not made to look like naked children?
3. Why post porn at all? (I think I got "to make retards heads explode" for this one.)
4. Do you think anyone is interested in seeing pictures of naked girls made to look underage?
4b. If not, why else would you post them?

Ready to believe. Fire away.

balls wrote:


I was really hoping you'd answer at lease ONE of my questions.

Good luck with your wait and make sure the maid knows to dust you off occasionally and make sure your feeding tube doesn't get infected.
Tell us all what hell is like when you've finished ice skating on it.

Fire away.

We'd love to. Just tie the pedo to a tree and we can finish the job.

This should be easy.

I wonder why there are no answers yet.

Don't hold your breath. You are even likely to be banned for trolling or free speech trampling if you keep askin.

balls wrote:

This should be easy.

I wonder why there are no answers yet.

No answers because uou posted it at2pm and he ant home from his shit job yet.

It happens. I'm sure he'll get around to it.

I sure do hope NewShon lets me know if my bumping this thread constitutes "trolling". I'm just trying to avoid looking for it.

So, anyhoo... Yeah. I've never been banned before. But, I have waited longer for answers before now. I sure do hope the "rules" haven't changed.

[q=balls I'm sure he'll get around to it.



ROFL!

Four fucked up marriages, 10,000 porn pics, 3 bankruptcies, and he's yet to admit to being wrong - ever.

Yeah. Hold your breath.

balls wrote:

1. Why do you post pictures of naked females made to appear to be naked children?

Out of the thousands of pictures I posted, only two meet that description, the first as a parody game thread, the infamous brace face. The second was to demonstrate to feathers & co that what I was typically posting was not models made up as children, but merely young legal age models. Big diference, they chose not to see it.

2. Why not just stick to naked adults who are not made to look like naked children?

Answered with #1.

3. Why post porn at all? (I think I got "to make retards heads explode" for this one.)

Like I said, Porn = Karma points, karma is the game. Where do you suppose CAP's karma came from? Intellectual posts? (LOL)

4. Do you think anyone is interested in seeing pictures of naked girls made to look underage?
4b. If not, why else would you post them?

For years my hotties threads recieved over 1000 hits a day, so yes, obviously the interest was there.... and I reiterate, these were not models made to look younger artificially, they were simply young looking, and one hell of a lot of people looked, and for the most part, little was said other than the occasional posting of objectionable photos in the hotties threads.

Women are Natures greatest art, I never posted photos promoting violence towards women, nor even joked about it.

I am sure I have a different prespective because of who I am married to, waking up next to my wife helps confirm to me I must be the luckiest man alive.

I grew up with Playboy centerfolds wallpapering the garage and workshop of my home, and my mother is a prolific author of erotic fiction, so when did everyone on FF suddenly become puritannical pussies? They are titties fer chrissakes.

What a load of bullshit.

Mm. Ok. Last question.

You can't imagine why a boat load of people get a stink twitch when they see the images in your profile?

I looked, and I kinda got shivers a few times. Legal or not, whatever. These aren't "playboy centerfolds". You have to go out of your way for that. And you kept going.

Some of them can't be older than 17, 18, 19. Legal, fuck that shit. If anyone took pictures of my 18 year old daughter FUCK YOU SHE'S "LEGAL" I'd cut their goddamned throat, and that's a fact.

So yeah, what the fuck ever.

Edit:
psh. grammar goes out the window when I smell bullshit. And don't give me any "karma" for this post. This isn't a fucking game.

TheMadPoet wrote:



Women are Natures greatest art,

This must be Nature's post-modern interpretation of a hideous chimpanzee.

TheMadPoet wrote:


I am sure I have a different prespective because of who I am married to, waking up next to my wife helps confirm to me I must be the luckiest man alive.

I'd feel like a complete failure and a pervert.

Right on schedule.

TheMadPoet@Fri Apr 13, 2012 09:49 PM wrote:

I grew up with Playboy centerfolds wallpapering the garage and workshop of my home, and my mother is a prolific author of erotic fiction, so when did everyone on FF suddenly become puritannical pussies? They are titties fer chrissakes.

Your old man was a degenerate, you think that is somehow normal that a man plasters the walls of his workshop and garage with centerfolds. He must have had a real short attention span.

Geeez, throw in the fucking towel already and go someplace else.

TheMadPoet wrote:

Like I said, Porn = Karma points, karma is the game. Where do you suppose CAP's karma came from? Intellectual posts? (LOL)

uhh, yeah. Go back and read his posts. Cap has more intelligent observations in one month than you and the rest of the pedo-lovers do combined.

Tell ya what, if he lowers himself to engage one of you, try to outwit him. You won't. Not even close.

TheMadPoet wrote:

Out of the thousands of pictures I posted, only two meet that description,...

Like I said, Porn = Karma points, karma is the game. Where do you suppose CAP's karma came from? Intellectual posts? (LOL)

Aside from the karma unwillingly made by dandeerslug's fucking up the K system, CAP's karma came from unadulterated French bashing and creative photoshopping of Jocelyn.

K for merely posting boobs is what devaluated the whole Karma feature. When googling for naked chicks becomes more rewarding than busting your ass or losing hours actually creating something or getting your hands (and someone else) dirty with photoshop, it's a no brainer.

The problem was never addressed by shon or the mods when the hotties thread began to fuck up the karma system. And here we are now on soapopera.com, now.

NOZZLE wrote:

Right on schedule.

TheMadPoet@Fri Apr 13, 2012 09:49 PM wrote:

I grew up with Playboy centerfolds wallpapering the garage and workshop of my home, and my mother is a prolific author of erotic fiction, so when did everyone on FF suddenly become puritannical pussies? They are titties fer chrissakes.

Your old man was a degenerate, you think that is somehow normal that a man plasters the walls of his workshop and garage with centerfolds. He must have had a real short attention span.

Geeez, throw in the fucking towel already and go someplace else.

Care to answer the quesion I put to you, or is that too tough?

TheMadPoet wrote:

NOZZLE wrote:

Right on schedule.

TheMadPoet@Fri Apr 13, 2012 09:49 PM wrote:

I grew up with Playboy centerfolds wallpapering the garage and workshop of my home, and my mother is a prolific author of erotic fiction, so when did everyone on FF suddenly become puritannical pussies? They are titties fer chrissakes.

Your old man was a degenerate, you think that is somehow normal that a man plasters the walls of his workshop and garage with centerfolds. He must have had a real short attention span.

Geeez, throw in the fucking towel already and go someplace else.

Care to answer the quesion I put to you, or is that too tough?

Is this the question you're referring to?

so when did everyone on FF suddenly become puritannical pussies?

You think everyone on FF is a puritannical pussy? Really? Are you joking?

So again, is that your question? I didn't see another.

If it's not, go ahead. Stop reading here. Post the question again. I must have missed it.

So that's your question?

You think you have to be a puritanical pussy to think that those pictures in your profile are a little off?

You don't have enough fiber in you to think for ONE MOTHER FUCKING SPLIT SECOND that it's reasonable to question someone who has that many naked girls OBVIOUSLY under 20 years old in their gallery?

The image I get when I see that is some piece of shit with his pants down with a white-knuckle grip on a chain link fence outside a high school.

Dude. Stop just for a second, and reflect.

No, I was referring to Nozzle

So why would someone post (repeatedly) nudes of Brook Sheilds at 12 oiled up and made up?

Fair question I think.

TheMadPoet wrote:

No, I was referring to Nozzle

So why would someone post (repeatedly) nudes of Brook Sheilds at 12 oiled up and made up?

Fair question I think.

Answering a question with a question? How pathetic.

Did you, or did you not, ban those posters who did the aforementioned?

So, why aren't you also banned? Your offenses are much worse. You're a fucking pedo-bomber..

Was it Tozer who said hat Pedos will always try to steer the conversation towards pedophilia? Here is why MadoPedo keeps asking questions

TheMadPoet wrote:

No, I was referring to Nozzle

So why would someone post (repeatedly) nudes of Brook Sheilds at 12 oiled up and made up?

Fair question I think.

Look... I hate playing this bullshit straw man game, but it's PROBABLY because he was picking on you for posting your garbage. I have no fucking idea. Maybe I'll ask him someday. In fact, I feel stupid for having even guessed, because that gives you a reason to stand that strawman back up. Fucking don't.


So, DON'T FUCKING CHANGE THE SUBJECT. Don't do the fr*nch/lib dance of trying to redirect attention to someone else,

UNLESS YOUR SAYING: "HE DID IT. WHY CAN'T I??", because THAT is what is seems like you're saying, and THAT is fucked up.

I'm getting way the fuck out of patience. I asked you a goddamn question. Why don't you ban yourself for trolling and wasting my motherfucking time?

balls wrote:

TheMadPoet wrote:

No, I was referring to Nozzle

So why would someone post (repeatedly) nudes of Brook Sheilds at 12 oiled up and made up?

Fair question I think.

Look... I hate playing this bullshit straw man game, but it's PROBABLY because he was picking on you for posting your garbage. I have no fucking idea. Maybe I'll ask him someday. In fact, I feel stupid for having even guessed, because that gives you a reason to stand that strawman back up. Fucking don't.


So, DON'T FUCKING CHANGE THE SUBJECT. Don't do the fr*nch/lib dance of trying to redirect attention to someone else,

UNLESS YOUR SAYING: "HE DID IT. WHY CAN'T I??", because THAT is what is seems like you're saying, and THAT is fucked up.

I'm getting way the fuck out of patience. I asked you a goddamn question. Why don't you ban yourself for trolling and wasting my motherfucking time?

I'm not asking you, I'm asking Nozzle, replying to his post, (it is his thread) and no, neither time he posted her was he replying to me. No, I don't expect to or want to post little kids, I don't need an excuse or your approval for what I do.

TheMadPoet wrote:

No, I was referring to Nozzle

So why would someone post (repeatedly) nudes of Brook Sheilds at 12 oiled up and made up?

Fair question I think.

The first time I posted that photo, which by the way has been adjudicated by a federal district court judge to be art and not pornography, it was part of a discussion and I copied a link posted by I think Axel.B.

I posted it again recently, again as part of a discussion.

What you are observing is people recoiling in disgust at what you sprinkle around here.

Like I said, time to throw in the towel and head someplace else.

And now you shut down the questioning.


Fact: It is not fucking normal to have an ass load of pictures of naked teenagers, "legal" or not.

You, have an ass load of pictures of naked teenagers, and have not ONCE acknowledged that it's reasonable to question that.

And, now you're saying it's not.


After you settle in to your withdrawal, ask yourself this:

"IF 15 WERE 'LEGAL', WOULD I HAVE PICTURES OF NAKED 15 YEAR OLDS?"