  Discussions The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 5)
en>fr fr>en By VAVD Comments: 4272, member since Wed Nov 25, 2009On Wed May 02, 2012 10:27 PM
How would you rate the French soldier of today in comparison with his counterparts in the armed forces of other leading nations?
Thanks for your responses. 56 Replies to The comparative effectiveness of today's French military |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 6)
en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Wed May 02, 2012 10:30 PM
Better than a Somali, but not quite an Argentinian conscript. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Wed May 02, 2012 10:33 PM
 This would be typical of a properly conducted, phased frluroxch relief in place. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By diefrog Comments: 8989, member since Wed Mar 12, 2003On Wed May 02, 2012 10:47 PM
ECs_Bro wrote:
Better than a Somali, but not quite an Argentinian conscript.
I don't know, Somalis can actually make their boats move in straight lines. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 8)
en>fr fr>en By poupon_le_french Comments: 29316, member since Thu Jul 24, 2003On Wed May 02, 2012 10:54 PM
When the french got in a firefight in Afghanistan, the entire unit was sent home because they were upset.
I'd rank them just below cub scout troop 254 from Bismark North Dakota, but better than the sixth grade chess club from Pawtucket middle school. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 5)
en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Wed May 02, 2012 11:02 PM
I respect you as a person, and as a FF old timer Poup, but frankly, your comparisons to good chess clubs and cub packs borders on libel. A retraction is in order, Good Sir. |
|
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By ThomasTruxtun Comments: 448, member since Tue Aug 03, 2010On Wed May 02, 2012 11:16 PM
VAVD wrote:
How would you rate the French soldier of today in comparison with his counterparts in the armed forces of other leading nations?
Thanks for your responses.
A better exercise would be the comparison of national guard forces in different states to the French military. In the case of Delaware or Rhode Island, it might be a close contest. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By Nappybonesapart Comments: 18369, member since Fri Aug 27, 2004On Thu May 03, 2012 02:20 AM
of other leading nations- possibly the nicest thing Vox has ever said about the frogs |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 5)
en>fr fr>en By Nappybonesapart Comments: 18369, member since Fri Aug 27, 2004On Thu May 03, 2012 02:55 AM
 In the french order of er battle , no unit not even the Legion is meaner, rougher or tougher than the Chaussettes D'Alpine.
In WW2 in Norway they bloodied Adolf's nose, whilst on the italian front , in odds surpassing Leonidas at Thermopolyae just 7 magnificent soldiers held an eyetie division or two
Here are these Gods of War on an exercise |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By ArthurH Comments: 21250, member since Thu Oct 17, 2002On Thu May 03, 2012 03:13 AM
|
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military en>fr fr>en By Nappybonesapart Comments: 18369, member since Fri Aug 27, 2004On Thu May 03, 2012 03:42 AM
1/2er was that your question? |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By ArthurH Comments: 21250, member since Thu Oct 17, 2002On Thu May 03, 2012 03:45 AM
Edited by ArthurH (45185) on 2012-05-03 03:48:25
No, and you will notice that the question isn't "are wankeestanis soldiers cowards ?", but "why are", so that the initial statement isn't even questioned by authoritative experts.
VAVD = desperation incarnated |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By martsy Comments: 3549, member since Mon May 19, 2003On Thu May 03, 2012 05:04 AM
When the french got in a firefight in Afghanistan, the entire unit was sent home because they were upset.
I wouldn't laugh at it. Don't you know their feelings were hurt badly?
The Talibs turned out no good and no sensitive about it.
That is why, We can't avoid this question again:
DO THE TALIBS TAK ORDERS FROM ISRAEL TOO?!! |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Thu May 03, 2012 07:08 PM
 They must be frlorxnch, they have already abandoned their rifles.... |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By poupon_le_french Comments: 29316, member since Thu Jul 24, 2003On Thu May 03, 2012 07:13 PM
ECs_Bro wrote:
I respect you as a person, and as a FF old timer Poup, but frankly, your comparisons to good chess clubs and cub packs borders on libel. A retraction is in order, Good Sir.
I heartily apologize to any youngster who would, rightfully feel insulted by my statement. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By djdv Comments: 3763, member since Mon Jul 10, 2006On Thu May 03, 2012 07:13 PM
 Some place slightly above their allies the palistiniscum yooots of the intafada but below Hezbollah whom the frogs take their orders from.
FUCK frace! |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By MadRusski Comments: 40591, member since Mon Aug 16, 2004On Thu May 03, 2012 07:17 PM
y ArthurH Comments: 19434, member since Thu Oct 17, 2002
On Thu May 03, 2012 03:45 AM
Edited by ArthurH (45185) on 2012-05-03 03:48:25
No, and you will notice that the question isn't "are wankeestanis soldiers cowards ?", but "why are",
French soldier
|
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By Nappybonesapart Comments: 18369, member since Fri Aug 27, 2004On Thu May 03, 2012 08:39 PM
Edited by Nappybonesapart (74912) on 2012-05-03 20:40:53
5K game for Newbs like EC bro, below 1000 comments ,spot the FF member in the patrol i posted above, for Tarte wearers don't need guns, they can kill n a variety of ways armed just with snowballs |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Thu May 03, 2012 11:05 PM
"Patrol"? I see a gaggle of fucksticks in OD prancing through a meadow. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By faqufrance Comments: 7859, member since Wed Nov 17, 2004On Thu May 03, 2012 11:15 PM
ECs_Bro wrote:
They must be frlorxnch, they have already abandoned their rifles....
The one in the middle of the picture, is excited. Seems the French just got their weekly allotment of anal lube. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Thu May 03, 2012 11:53 PM
faqufrance wrote:
ECs_Bro wrote:
They must be frlorxnch, they have already abandoned their rifles....
The one in the middle of the picture, is excited. Seems the French just got their weekly allotment of anal lube.
There is a little tube of KY in every flornch ration pack. We have Hot Sauce, they have butt lube. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By GhostDivision Comments: 5488, member since Thu Feb 09, 2006On Fri May 04, 2012 12:10 AM
Edited by GhostDivision (79003) on 2012-05-04 00:11:55
ArthurH wrote:
No, and you will notice that the question isn't "are wankeestanis soldiers cowards ?", but "why are", so that the initial statement isn't even questioned by authoritative experts.
VAVD = desperation incarnated
You'll soon learn your place in the global pecking order, you Walloony imbecile. Belgium is a third-rate, muzz-infested nation of Eurotards. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military en>fr fr>en By ECs_Bro Comments: 1464, member since Sun Oct 23, 2011On Fri May 04, 2012 12:22 AM
 As far as I am concerned, belgium's only decent contribution to the world is the FAL. Other than that, they are a horrific mixture of fllorxnch, dutxch and nazi. |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military en>fr fr>en By ArthurH Comments: 21250, member since Thu Oct 17, 2002On Fri May 04, 2012 12:38 AM
Funny to see these wankeestanis losers and canuck imbeciles having nothing left but legends regarding member nationalities to chew on 
North America = plebeian coward sissies collapsing tribe (filthy limey mud hut dwellers heritage) |
re: The comparative effectiveness of today's French military en>fr fr>en By Nappybonesapart Comments: 18369, member since Fri Aug 27, 2004On Fri May 04, 2012 01:10 AM
you forgot chocolate, fries and beer , they have their priorities sorted |