| News: USA
USA Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 7)
en>fr fr>en By TexanForever Comments: 21031, member since Thu Jun 10, 2004On Mon Jan 21, 2013 09:42 PM
Edited by TexanForever (74535) on 2013-01-21 20:43:28
Edited by TexanForever (74535) on 2013-01-21 20:45:14
Is something brewing in the windmill of Obama's mind ?
.
Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens'
BARACK OBAMA, JANUARY 21, 2013, BY: DAVE GIBSON
This would explain why he wants to disarm us...
On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama's second term.
Garrow made the following Facebook post:
I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.
So, who is the source?
Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”
Understand, this is not coming from Alex Jones or Jesse Ventura, or from anyone else the left often dismisses with great ease.
Garrow is a well-respected activist and has spent much of his life rescuing infant girls from China, babies who would be killed under that country's one-child policy. He was also nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for his work.
His bio on Amazon.com reads:
"Dr. James Garrow is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China. He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees."
This comes on the heels of Sunday's report in the Washington Free Beacon (WFB) that the head of Central Command, Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis is being dismissed by Obama and will leave his post in March.
The WFB article states:
“Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”
Did Gen. Mattis refuse to "fire on U.S. citizens?"
www.examiner.com . . .
Is martial law imminent?
NEWS AUGUST 2, 2009, BY: DAVE GIBSON
A somewhat disturbing ad recently appeared on internet employment sites, the ad in question was placed by the National Guard. Apparently, the Guard is now looking for people to work at internment camps.
Here is the ad as it appeared:
“Correction Officer Internment / Resettlement Specialist”
“As an Internment/Resettlement Specialist for the Army National Guard, you will ensure the smooth running of military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility, similar to those duties conducted by civilian Corrections Officers. This will require you to know proper procedures and military law; and have the ability to think quickly in high-stress situations. Specific duties may include assisting with supervision and management operations; providing facility security; providing custody, control, supervision, and escort; and counseling individual prisoners in rehabilitative programs.”
So, why is the National Guard hiring “Internment / Resettlement Specialists?”
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, 15,000 federal troops patrolled the streets of New Orleans. We were told that they were there to stop the looting and perform humanitarian duties. Of course, the widespread looting was brought under control, but under that control, many law-abiding citizens also lost their rights as well. Soldiers as well as armed Blackwater contractors went house to house, detaining citizens and confiscating their firearms…Martial law had come to New Orleans.
The worst scene I can remember from those terrible days was of a patrol of U.S. soldiers arriving at the home of an elderly woman. The soldiers forced their way into the woman´s home, wrestled her to her kitchen floor, handcuffed her, and confiscated her revolver (her only protection against the violent criminals in that city). The woman cried and pleaded with the soldiers to allow her to protect herself.
Despite her loud protests, the soldiers then picked up the woman and placed her onto the back of their truck. Though she wanted to stay in her home, these soldiers took her away against her own will.
I don´t know what happened to that poor woman, but I remember thinking…My God! If that can happen there, it can happen in any other American city!
Unfortunately, it would appear that the groundwork for martial law in this country has been laid and may be soon implemented. It could be declared in the event of another terrorist attack, a natural disaster, or even a worsening financial crisis.
On October 13, 2008, President of Euro Pacific Capital Peter Schiff appeared on the Glenn Beck Show. Their most troubling exchange follows:
SCHIFF: “You know, what`s going to happen, of course, is as inflation starts running out of control and prices start going through the roof, the government again is going to focus on the symptoms and not the disease.And they are going to impose price controls on energy, on food, on a lot of other things that are vital, which means shortages, which means long lines, black markets, civil unrest. All this stuff is coming if we don`t stop. [...]
BECK: Peter, let`s talk a little bit about martial law. Why would that even be a consideration?
SCHIFF: Well, I don`t think it was a threat if they had rejected the bailout Bill, but I think it is a possibility a few years down the line. We just spoke a little bit about price controls and the effect that they are going to have.
If we have shortages of food, if we have rolling blackouts. And people are upset, and they are hungry, and they are cold, there could be civil unrest. There could be looting, rioting, and that might be the impetus for the government to declare martial law.
BECK: You know, I don`t think you`re a couple of years away from something like that. I mean, honestly, Peter, I mean, look at what`s happening. In a half hour, I`ve got a congressman on about — about the racism cries. I mean, there are people that are right now so disenfranchised, and I think being encouraged to be disenfranchised on both sides, that at any time this damn thing could break apart.
SCHIFF: Yes. And we`re giving the government so much power. And you know, you give up a lot more civil liberties. When you have martial law and you`ve got the military policing our streets, when you`ve got suspension of habeas corpus, you`ve got curfews, you can`t be out of your house after dark, and they can just pick you up and put you in prison and keep you there indefinitely without charges, and there`s nothing you can do about it?
I mean, we`re giving up one liberty after another, all to protect ourselves from this economic crisis, which needs to happen anyway, but it doesn`t need to be nearly this bad.
BECK: Peter, this is — I mean, we`re in Crazytown, USA. But my gut tells me that, two years down the road — let`s just use that number — this country is not going to look anything like it does today. Our world has changed; it just hasn`t caught up.”
On October 17, 2006, President Bush signed into law, the John Warner Defense Authorization Act. The new law allows the President to declare a "public emergency" at his own discretion, and place federal troops anywhere throughout the United States. Under this law, the President also now has the authority to federalize National Guard troops without the consent of Governors, in order to restore "public order." The President can now deploy federal troops to U.S. cities, at will, which eliminates the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. In short, President Obama can now declare Martial Law anytime he pleases.
An Excerpt from the John Warner Defense Authorization Act follows:
“Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.”
On October 1, 2008 the U.S. Army´s 1st Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division began their stateside mission under U.S. Northern Command. It was the first time that an active duty Army unit has been assigned this type of mission. They are known as the CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force. They are responsible for responding to terrorist attacks, and restoring order in case of civil unrest.
Among supposed humanitarian duties, their specific job is to provide crowd and traffic control, and to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.
In addition to their standard weapons, the 1st Brigade has been equipped with mobile road blocks, spike strips for stopping vehicles, shields and batons, beanbag bullets, and taser guns.
In September 2008, Col. Roger Cloutier told the Army Times: "It´s a new modular package of non-lethal capabilities that they´re fielding. They´ve been using pieces of it in Iraq, but this is the first time that these modules were consolidated and this package fielded, and because of this mission we´re undertaking we were the first to get it."
The soldiers of the Third Infantry Divison are battle-hardened combat veterans and have done three tours of duty in Iraq, they hardly seem suited to "crowd control" duties.
Ordinarily, such use of the military on U.S. soil would violate the law. However, with Bush´s order to suspend Posse Comitatus, the military is now free to patrol the streets of our cities and arrest American citizens.
Actually, the use of federal troops has already begun in this country. On December 10, 2008, the California Highway Patrol announced that they along with local law enforcement, and U.S. Marines to staff sobriety checkpoints. That’s right, Marines are conducting vehicle stops on U.S. soil.
The following is a press release from the CHP:
“The Morongo office of the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in conjunction with the San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department and the USMC military police will conduct a joint sobriety/driver license checkpoint on Friday, December 12, 2008, somewhere in the unincorporated/incorporated area of San Bernardino County.”
Last Fall, the Congress approved the $850 billion bailout of Wall Street, but not before the public overwhelmingly objected, which prompted the House of Representatives to initially reject the bill. Despite our objections, many Congressmen who only days earlier were adamantly opposed to any such measure, returned and voted to approve the bailout and even added $150 billion to the original bill. Why would lawmakers only a month away from an election make such a vastly unpopular move?
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) seems to have answered this question, though the press has largely ignored the stunning information he divulged.
Congressman Sherman on the House floor told his colleagues and the C-SPAN cameras alike: "Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day, another couple thousand points the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no."
Additionally, a very troubling report came out in August 2007, when KSLA-12 in Shreveport, Louisiana reported that members of the clergy have been enrolled in a federal education program, which teaches them how to "quell dissent" amongst their congregations. So-called Clergy Response Teams are being trained by FEMA to convince people to follow government orders, in the event of martial law.
The evidence that we the people, are at risk of being placed under martial law, and losing all of our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution is overwhelming.
Thirty years ago, we enjoyed the benefits of a press which took their responsibility to the public very seriously. Any signs pointing to the implementation of martial law and criminal actions committed by the federal government would have drawn the attention of our journalists.
However, in the age of "imbedded reporters," and 90-minute network infomercials complete with anchors promoting government healthcare, our press has a much-too cozy relationship with those in government. A complicit press is making it very easy for our government to erode civil liberties.
www.examiner.com . . .
. 29 Replies to Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 7)
en>fr fr>en By ReBourne Comments: 8919, member since Sat Oct 24, 2009On Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:10 PM
IF the shit hits the fan....and it's starting to look more and more likely, reporters, politicians and big name liberals will all be prime targets for everything from conservatives to X-military to the lunatic fringe.
Things will quickly get deadly serious. I would expect at least 60% of far left liberals to end up dead or in another country. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By JFrum Comments: 4841, member since Sat Nov 19, 2011On Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:24 PM
ReBourne wrote:
IF the shit hits the fan....and it's starting to look more and more likely, reporters, politicians and big name liberals will all be prime targets for everything from conservatives to X-military to the lunatic fringe.
Things will quickly get deadly serious. I would expect at least 60% of far left liberals to end up dead or in another country. And especially cops and other enforcers of this shit. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By lookanlearn Comments: 10059, member since Sun Jun 10, 2007On Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:27 PM
Edited by lookanlearn (80657) on 2013-01-21 23:56:26
Edited by lookanlearn (80657) on 2013-01-21 23:57:39
Recent history.
3 decades ago (or thereabouts), I was in Warminster in the Army on a training course, when Margaret Thatcher was doing exactly this (during the UK 1979-1981 STRIKES).
Thatcher arranged that a battalion of infantry be divided in two; and began training the `Southern based` soldiers to go North to `Back-up the Police` MILITARILY, in case of societal breakdown (kill northerners).
And, separately, they were training the Northern soldiers to `Back-up` the Southern Police `MILITARILY`, in case of societal breakdown in the south of England (shoot the public if ordered).
Classic strategy to CONTROL a people.
Some politicians were very concerned (the Tory party Cabinet were very Tense)...but it was very hush, hush at the time. Still is.
P.S.
It took over 30 years to get an honest report into the UK killings of the Irish on `Bloody Sunday`, so its no surprise plans of other matters (aforementioned) `not quite implemented on the ground` were put under wraps.
Not a country I wanted to fight for.
Meanwhile the Gov were importing negroe`s and muslim scum by the shipload every day and gave them the British people homes, and tax, via welfare.
Unbelievably mental country, really.
Good riddance. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By LMAO  Comments: 17415, member since Sun Nov 06, 2005On Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:45 PM
8 billion rounds of 40?
Yea, Practice.
Blow it out your ass Howard. Ill be in the woods. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By NOZZLE Comments: 15138, member since Mon Mar 07, 2005On Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:55 PM
Based on what I have seen, between the morons writing position papers at West Point on why TeaBaggers are a threat to national security and the kind of rockheads I see driving homeland security cars around I think you can count on members of the military shooting citizens dead at the first opportunity. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By JFrum Comments: 4841, member since Sat Nov 19, 2011On Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:09 AM
LMAO wrote:
8 billion rounds of 40?
Yea, Practice.
Blow it out your ass Howard. Ill be in the woods. I think they bought all that ammo to keep it off the civilian market.But if that was the purpose they should have bought 9mm.9mm is sold out here,but theres plenty of 40 S&w.You cant buy a brick of .22's here either,soldout | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By JFrum Comments: 4841, member since Sat Nov 19, 2011On Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:15 AM
NOZZLE wrote:
Based on what I have seen, between the morons writing position papers at West Point on why TeaBaggers are a threat to national security and the kind of rockheads I see driving homeland security cars around I think you can count on members of the military shooting citizens dead at the first opportunity. I agree.The cops have been militarizing for years and love power.Last year at a domestic violence call,the swat team cordons off a 2block area around this shabby apt complex.Then they attached grapling hooks and tore the whole side of the building off.Give them the slightest excuse and they'll breakout your car windows if they pull you over.But they are vastly outnumbered in WROL situation.Lot of people have an axe to grind with the police. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By ReBourne Comments: 8919, member since Sat Oct 24, 2009On Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:19 AM
NOZZLE wrote:
Based on what I have seen, between the morons writing position papers at West Point on why TeaBaggers are a threat to national security and the kind of rockheads I see driving homeland security cars around I think you can count on members of the military shooting citizens dead at the first opportunity.
If so, dead ground pounders are a good source of 9mm and 5.56 NATO as well as grenades. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Obama4Life Comments: 108, member since Sun Nov 11, 2012On Tue Jan 22, 2013 02:03 AM
You right-wing sheep are so ridiculously funny. I see you all with your big talk, but nothing happens. You all are just a bunch of whining pussies, polluting the net with your hot, fishy air. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By NOZZLE Comments: 15138, member since Mon Mar 07, 2005On Tue Jan 22, 2013 02:08 AM
Obama4Life wrote:
You right-wing sheep are so ridiculously funny. I see you all with your big talk, but nothing happens. You all are just a bunch of whining pussies, polluting the net with your hot, fishy air.
Cunt, do you really believe that we are planning on taking on the govt in skirmish lines?
What big talk, I have yet to read one post on this site that exhorts violence against the govt. Try the occutard sites. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By Obama4Life Comments: 108, member since Sun Nov 11, 2012On Tue Jan 22, 2013 02:15 AM
You are too stupid, Nozzle, to understand the posts above you? You don't have the intellect of a toilet, not to mention the lawyer that people think you are. LOL. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 6)
en>fr fr>en By robert99 Comments: 5125, member since Thu Jun 02, 2005On Tue Jan 22, 2013 06:31 AM
"Obama4Life": What does that label say of someone who dares to call anyone else a sheep? | |
re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 4)
en>fr fr>en By LMAO  Comments: 17415, member since Sun Nov 06, 2005On Tue Jan 22, 2013 07:42 AM
The full list of proposals New York State:
1. Confiscation of "assault weapons"
2. Confiscation of ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder's information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as "assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons
Still Love New York? | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By ReBourne Comments: 8919, member since Sat Oct 24, 2009On Tue Jan 22, 2013 08:16 AM
LMAO wrote:
The full list of proposals New York State:
1. Confiscation of "assault weapons"
2. Confiscation of ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder's information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as "assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons
Still Love New York?
Never did. Never will.
FUCK NY with a broken bottle!!! | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By chevy Comments: 10164, member since Tue Nov 16, 2004On Tue Jan 22, 2013 08:52 AM
ReBourne wrote:
LMAO wrote:
The full list of proposals New York State:
1. Confiscation of "assault weapons"
2. Confiscation of ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder's information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as "assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons
Still Love New York?
Never did. Never will.
FUCK NY with a broken bottle!!!
Spent 5 years in that God forsaken place. why FrogFryer and others stay there is beyond me other that the money. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 5)
en>fr fr>en By TexanForever Comments: 21031, member since Thu Jun 10, 2004On Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:02 AM
Edited by TexanForever (74535) on 2013-01-22 09:05:45
.
... Obozo4Life is obviously a website troll; haven't you guys figured that out? He, she (or it?) gets kicks from stirring people up with dissension, name calling, insults, etc. When done in a joking or humorous way it's good sport, but with Obama4Life it's a classic indicator of neurosis or possibly even psychosis. The best way to deal with nut-case trolls is to just ignore them. A strong emotional reaction is what they're after and their big reward. They're too timid, weak, and probably fearful of doing their thing face-to-face in real life. Ignore them online and they usually go away.
( I'm waiting for Obama4Life's reaction to this comment. )
. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By jukinj3 Comments: 15927, member since Tue Apr 08, 2003On Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:46 AM
TexanForever wrote:
.
... Obozo4Life is obviously a website troll; haven't you guys figured that out? He, she (or it?) gets kicks from stirring people up with dissension, name calling, insults, etc. When done in a joking or humorous way it's good sport, but with Obama4Life it's a classic indicator of neurosis or possibly even psychosis. The best way to deal with nut-case trolls is to just ignore them. A strong emotional reaction is what they're after and their big reward. They're too timid, weak, and probably fearful of doing their thing face-to-face in real life. Ignore them online and they usually go away.
( I'm waiting for Obama4Life's reaction to this comment. )
.
I agree and amazed that a sub-80IQer can even type. These are the people that are so mentally and emotionally retarded that all they can do is go with what others tell them to do. There is no ability for them to conceive of anything but the most simple concepts of doing what they are told. Independent thought is beyond these not just ignorant but most decidedly stupid people. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By bloodhound  Comments: 6215, member since Thu Jan 05, 2006On Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:48 AM
Happy I have my little hideout way out in the country, along with a nice little armory! Fuck Obama and his goons! | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By LMAO  Comments: 17415, member since Sun Nov 06, 2005On Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:22 PM
Fuck! I just got a call from the range. It appears my .22 magazines arrived. They aint fucking cheap either. BUT now I will have 6.
all 12 round mags in 22lr | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By WilyB Comments: 29746, member since Sat Apr 26, 2003On Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:41 PM
 LMAO wrote:
... all 12 round mags in 22lr
That is sweet, LAMO, but even if some may not consider 22LRs to be real weapons, ain't you forbidden to own a firearm due to having served time in jail?
In Virginia, convicted felons are not allowed to own weapons. | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By nerka Comments: 7381, member since Wed Nov 08, 2006On Tue Jan 22, 2013 01:06 PM
Edited by nerka (80114) on 2013-01-22 12:08:08
LyingMAO wrote:
Fuck! I just got a call from the range. It appears my .22 magazines arrived. They aint fucking cheap either. BUT now I will have 6.
all 12 round mags in 22lr
Careful with those 22ls....you have trouble with the recoil from the shorts....lol....get your daddy to show you the way, "no boat" | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By GhostDivision Comments: 5531, member since Thu Feb 09, 2006On Tue Jan 22, 2013 02:22 PM
nerka wrote:
LyingMAO wrote:
Fuck! I just got a call from the range. It appears my .22 magazines arrived. They aint fucking cheap either. BUT now I will have 6.
all 12 round mags in 22lr
Careful with those 22ls....you have trouble with the recoil from the shorts....lol....get your daddy to show you the way, "no boat"
What've you got for home defense? A Daisy BB gun?  | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By LMAO  Comments: 17415, member since Sun Nov 06, 2005On Tue Jan 22, 2013 02:48 PM
WilyQ, I have made statements on this site to indicate that I received my rights back in full. If your to fucking stupid to look it up, thats your fault. CCP here in Georgia is pretty easy. Walk in to the county government building, fill out the paperwork, 3 pages, pay the fee, receive your CCP in the mail in 4 weeks. Go to the range and buy what you want to carry. At the moment it's the Browning 9MM with 17 Black Talons. Last night at dinner was the 38 snubby.
nerka,
You ate paint chips as a kid didn't you? I have more time on the shitter offshore, then you have, offshore.
Wicked kewl Tattoo there Speed Racer. Or was it Banana Splits?
Oh shit sorry, its an Inspector Gadget Tattoo !
GO GO GADGET Free candy VAN ! | re: Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who 'will fire on U.S. citizens' en>fr fr>en By WilyB Comments: 29746, member since Sat Apr 26, 2003On Tue Jan 22, 2013 03:19 PM
LMAO wrote:
WilyQ, I have made statements on this site to indicate that I received my rights back in full.
www.mysouthwestga.com . . .
Wow, congratulations, that appears to be a long (5 years) and almost impossible process. I am happy for you. |
ReplySendWatch
|
Advertise Here
The Ban Chroniclesbizlah paid to be unbanned at Sat Dec 22 14:38
PistolPierre banned ArthurH for 24 hours on Wed Sep 19 15:40 with the message 'Speak English'
PistolPierre banned ArthurH for 24 hours on Sun Sep 02 14:27 with the message 'Fag'
ArthurH paid to be unbanned at Sun Sep 02 13:28
PistolPierre banned ArthurH for 24 hours on Sun Sep 02 13:18 with the message 'Fuck you'
|